Dr. Neel Shah, Founder of Costs of Care
This week, hosts Mark Masselli and Margaret Flinter speak with Dr. Neel Shah, Asst. Professor of Obstetrics and Gynocology at Harvard Medical School and Founder of Costs of Care, a global NGO dedicated to helping delivery systems provide better care at lower costs. He’s also the co-author of “Understanding Value Based Care” which seeks to promote cost awareness in the medical profession.
Mark Masselli: This is Conversations on Health C are , I ’m Mark Masselli.
Margaret Flinter: And I ’m Margaret Flinter.
Mark Masselli: Well Margaret a month left ago before 2015 draws to a close and a
couple of important topics to note, World AIDS Day. Well treatment have improved
where most HIV positives can manage the infection as a chronic disease, still some 38
million people have b e come infected globally since the year 2000.
Margaret Flinter: 23 million people have died from AIDS related causes . T he v ast
majority of the 37 million people who live with HIV worldwide live in Third World
countries almost 3 million of them children.
Mark Masselli: Well the prevalence is far lower than western hemisphere. It's an issue
that doesn’t get talked about en ough in the U . S . there is an estimated 50,000 new
infections every year in this country and it's so important to make HIV testing a standard
part of health care and keep infections from spreading.
Margaret Flinter: An actor Charlie Sheen’s recent disclosu re about his HIV positive
status is a stark reminder as if we needed one that the infection is still very much a
health issue that can impact anyone.
Mark Masselli: Currently about 15 million HIV positive people are receiving the life
saving treatment but millions more are still in need.
Margaret Flinter: Another issue that’s taking center stage this month is climate change
a nd the Climate Change Summit is happening in Paris with global experts from the front
lines gathering to try and reach agreement on solutions to this issue which threatens the
health of the entire planet.
Mark Masselli: The experts we have spoken with are in agreement. It's here and it's
already having a negative impact on human health from droughts leading to starvation
to extreme w eather events.
Margaret Flinter: So let’s hope we can come to agreement on some strategies to
address it.
Mark Masselli: 21st C entury health care is also experiencing much change, our guest
today Dr. Neel Sha h is author of the critically acclaimed Unders tanding Value Based
Care which looks at ways the health care system could be recalibrated to incentivize the
quality of care while containing the cost of care .
Margaret Flinter: And Lori Robertson will stop by, she is always on the hunt for
misstatements spoken about health policy in the public domain but no matter what the
topic you can hear all of our shows by going to chcradio.com.
Mark Masselli: And as always if you have comments please email us at
chcradio@chc 1.com or find us on Facebook or Twitter we love hearing from you.
Margaret Flinter: We will get to our interview with Dr. Neel Shah in just a moment.
Mark Masselli: But first here is our producer Marianne O'Hare with this week's headline
news.
(Music)
Ma rianne O'Hare: I'm Marianne O'Hare with these health care headlines. Big pharma
getting even bigger , the boards of Pfizer and Allergan have agreed to $160 bi llion
merger in which the Irish - based maker of Botox and the New York - based maker of
Viagra agreed to join forces extensively allowing Pfizer to change its home base to
Ireland. The move would allow Pfizer to take advantage of Ireland’s more favorable
corporate tax rate and still conduct business as before.
The move would c reate the largest pharmaceutical entity in the world and save Pfizer
about 7% in tax payouts . Pfizer’s officials claim it's not just about the i n version claiming
they get Allergan’s additional expertise in allergies, obstetrics and dermatology.
UnitedHea lthcare has unleashed a shot over the bow on the Affordable Care Act saying
it was considering pulling out of the federal exchange . UnitedHealth Group laid out a
litany of reasons on why it may stop selling individual health insurance to federal and
state markets in 2017 . The move, some see as an effort to compel The Obama
Administration to ease regulations and make good on promised payments , t here was
problems including low participation by healthy people have led to financial losses
a cc o r ding to UnitedH eath. The firm did not say it would definitely hope sa l e s in 2017
but warned it would strongly consider doing so based on what happens in the next few
months.
And giving thanks is not just good for the soul, apparently it's good for the heart as well
at least a healthy dose of gratitude is good for your heart health. According to research
of Paul Mills , a professor of Family Medicine and Public Health , at the University o f
Cali fornia San Diego School of Medicine . He did a study recruiting a 186 men and
women, average age 66 who already had some damage to the heart t hey each filled out
a standard questionnaire to rate how grateful they felt for the people , places or things in
th eir lives, turned out the more grateful people were, the healthier they were. They had
less depressed mood, felt better and had more energy according to Mills. They also
followed patients over time and found those who wrote in a journal several times a w eek
jotting down specific things they were grateful for did even better long term. I am
Marianne O'Hare with these health care headlines.
(Music)
Mark Masselli: We are speaking today with Dr. Neel Shah , F ounder and Executive
Director of Cost of Care, a global NGO that seeks to help delivery systems provide
better care at lower cost. He is the co - author of high ly acclaimed Understanding Value
Based Healthcare. Dr. Shah is an Assistant Professor of Obstetrics , Gynecology and
Reproductive Biology at Harva rd Medical School. He is an Associate Professor at the
Ariadne Labs for Health Systems Innovation where he leads a 50 hospital consortium
linking administrative management to clinical performance. He was named as one of
Becker's Hospital Review 40 smarte st people in health care. He earned his Masters in
Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and is MD at Brown
University. Dr. Shah welcome to Conversations on Health C are .
Dr. Neel Shah: Thanks so much.
Mark Masselli: You learned pretty early in your medical training about the huge
variations in health care pricing and how medical training did very little to prepare future
clinicians for thinking about delivery from the value perspective. And you and a couple
of your partners lau n ched Cost of Care in 2009 with a mission of transforming
Americans health care delivery. I wonder if you could share with our listeners more
about the goals of the organization and how that mission has evolved.
Dr. Neel Shah: Absolutely . So , generally the way medical school works, you spend
about a quarter centur y in a classroom and then when you are in 25th grade or so,
when you are third year medical student they finally let you put on a white coat and
touch real patients. And my idea of being a doct or was mostly based on what I had
seen on the TV . A nd during your third year medical school your job is to kind of walk
into every door of the hospital and learn what happens there . F or the first time I got a
sense of our fallibility as well. And in par ticular I noticed that in Providence Rhode
Island where I was in school especially the patients that c ome to see students and
residents they are not the ones with the deep pockets . And I noticed that we are
making a lot of decisions in a vacuum without really any sense of how our decisions
impact to the patient s who are paying.
And the most surprising thing to me was that when you are third year medical student
everybody above you seems on mission, even the fourth year medical students
(inaudible 6:53 ) . And this was the one thing that even the most est ee med professors
didn’t really have a lot of insight into.
Margaret Flinter: Well Dr. Shah the notion of value based care I think finally started to
really gain some traction in this country and certainl y I give some credit of that maybe to
the policy initiatives and the Affordable Care Act and changes to the way CMS is paying
for the value of care received. But you are an OB/GYN, you practice within a Pioneer
ACO so you have had a pretty firsthand look at some of the real challenges in getting
organizations and practitioners to think more about value based care . A nd you say it's
not an operational change for practitioners but it's really a huge cultural change. What
have been some of the greatest challenges so far in shifting the culture?
Dr. Neel Shah: I mean , I think often when people talk about health care reform they are
conflating two things; there is payment reform and then there is delivery reform. And I
think the Affordable Care Act, Acco untable Care Organizations sort of risk based
contracting or value based payments lot of it has to do with sort of top - down incentives
to think more about value. In 1994 you are still getting AOL CVs sent to you in the
email and that was the state of the Internet . Whereas today the Internet is very , very
different and every other purchasing decision we make is based on Yelp and Travelocity
and other sites that have transparent quality and pricing information.
And I think in 2015 there is a similar expecta tion that we should believe [ph] same in
health care . A t the same time lot of patients are facing very high deductibles . S o I think
you know where patients are with us both in terms of their exposure to cost and in terms
of their expectations around info rmation and transparency is very different. I think in
many ways that’s what pushing, not just payment reform but like delivery reform and
now it's incumbent on us as clinicians to figure out how we fundamentally reengineer
the way we deliver care and that takes some heavy lifting for sure.
Mark Masselli: I think you noted in Massachusetts that , which has had almost about a
decade of universal coverage health expenders are still a leading cause of personal
bankruptcy and financial difficulty for consumers . A nd so tell our listeners about the
solutions that Cost of Care is looking at to incentivize players , and payers , and
providers and consumers alike.
Dr. Ne el Shah: We are 7 - 8 years ahead of us in country in terms of covering everyone
in Massachusetts but now we are 7 or 8 years ahead in terms of running out of money
to pay for it. And because we didn’t have – it's not like we had a new pot of money
which h as sort of spread it around more . S o there is more people on the system but
those people have less good insurance . T he average silver plan has deductible that is
$3,000 or $4,000 or $5,000 w h ich is real money for most people. And then when you
couple th at with all of the , sort of arbitrariness around pricing you know one CT scan will
be a big part of that deductible. So in terms of our work and it goes back to the original
question around sort of our mission how it's evolved.
We started off primarily as an advocacy organization trying to build well within the
profession , the clinic al professions to consider cost because not only was I not taught
very much about cost when I was a medical student but I was actually specifically
taught that costs weren’t something I should be thinking about. So what we have done
over the years is we have collected now over a 500 stories, real stories from patients,
clinicians and health care administrators as well from all over the country that illustrate
the sort of rout ine opportunities to make care more affordable for patients . A nd we have
disseminated them to well positioned stakeholders.
And in doing that we have tried to bring attention to all the opportunity there is to
improve care around affordability just by mak ing different decisions . A nd then we
realize that you can educate clinicians they can have the will to consider cost but if you
embed them in system and set them up for failure you are not doing any good . S o we
now have an implementation piece of our work too that’s tr y ing to think about how you
design the system around the clinician to help them make better choices.
Margaret Flinter: Well Dr. Shah when you talk about your book Understanding Value
Based Care , Don Berwick called this book an instant cl assic because it offered front line
clinicians a raft of practical ideas to make health care dramatically sa fer, more patient
focused. So what are those actionable strategies for individual clinicians or
organizations?
Dr. Neel Shah: The book starts off by just sort of trying to help people understand why
we are where we are now including why our health care price is so opaque. As we look
at the average American me dical bill you are actually staring at a medical bill and you
are a physician or a nurse th at’s probably like the first time you have really scrutinize d
one . T he second problem is that the prices are arbitrarily determined and often inflated
but the problem with that issue is that clinicians don’t feel ownership over that issue
because they don’t set prices.
The third problem which is the much bigger problem that clinicians directly own though
is there are a lot of line items on the average bill don’t need to be there. About a third of
the things that we decide to order as clinicians don’t m easurably improve health care
outcomes but we found in our research and our work that there is actually 10 to 20 other
distinct reasons why clinicians do this which is a muc h lower hanging fruit than say t ort
reform and then we get down to really concrete strategies like how to do high value
prescribing all the way to how did it actually design value improvement projects within
your delivery system.
Mark Masselli: We are speaking today with Dr. Neel Shah, Founder and Executive
Director of Cost of Care and also co - author of Understanding Value Based Healthcare.
Dr. Shah is Assistant Professor of Obstetrics , Gynecology and Reproductive Biology at
Harvard Medical School and is a professor at the Ariadne Labs for Health Systems
Innovation. Dr. Shah you give a great example of how health care has gone far off -
track and that’s the dramatic rise in C - sections performed in this country . I am not sure
if our listeners know it's currently the most commonly performed surgery in the United
States and we have had Lea h Binder from Leapfrog Group on the show discussing the
transparency campaign recording hospital C - sections . T ell us the kind of strategies you
have deployed in your practice that might be an example for others.
Dr. Neel Shah: The 50 year view in health care like in 1955 Dwight Eisenhower ha s a
heart attack and they tell him to sleep if off , he gets like a month of bed rest. In 2015 ,
he would have gotten a beta blocker and an angiogram and a stent and he would have
lived 10 years longer. And over the last 20 years The Patient Safety Movement has
focused so much on the problem of too little that in many cases we have overcorrected
and C - sections is I think t he perfect example where it's become 500% more common.
And what Leah Binder and others have found actually is that one of your biggest risk
factors for getting a C - section isn’t your own risks or preferences but it's literally which
door you walked, it's like which hospital you go to. And our own work especially thinking
about with C - sections a normal delivery first time it can easily take 20 hours from when
you go into labor to when the baby gets delivered whereas a C - section takes me 30
minutes, I just did one.
So there is always a sort of implicit incentives to expedite the process emergency
medicine physicians face the same sort of thing where you know they have got a
complex patient who comes into the ED they can either admit which is the low
resistan ce pathway or they can coordinate care and send them back out into the wild.
In many instances in health care we have faced these sorts of choices and the strength
of the incentives to take the low resistance pathway depends on a lot of factors in the
cli nical environment including how the hospital i s managed.
Margaret Flinter: Another big opportunity I guess is at the level of the practice to make
the decisions about ordering tests and prescribing medications and we have followed
with such interest the Choosing Wisely campaign and their goal is to get providers to
think very carefully about the evidence and the need for ordering a test versus the habit .
T alk about how programs like Choosing Wisely tie into your view of how we can make a
difference.
Dr. Neel Shah: Absolutely . Choosing Wisely has been tremendous. It's become an
international movement now with several countries , in the U . S . I think there is more than
80 specialties now that all have this list of the five things within their clinical purv iew that
we do routinely but maybe don’t have to the clinical specialties for taking ownership
including like radiologists and cardiologists and oncologist s other folks who use a lot of
expensive health care resources. And then the other thing what they d o is they take the
existing evidence for what we should do and they reframe it in terms of the evidence for
what we shouldn’t do and I think that’s really powerful too.
The challenge though is that there are many things in medicine for which we have
excell ent evidence but it doesn’t really change practice. And I think that’s sort of where
we are with Choosing Wisely now , we ’ve sort of gotten to a point where we have raised
great awareness of these issues. But then there is that second step of closing the gap
between what we know we should do and what we actually do . A nd one of the best
examples of this gap I think is hand washing . Y ou know , as obstetrician a 150 years
ago figured out, before we knew anything about bacteria that if you wash your hands
you cut mortality in half .
Margaret Flinter: Right.
Dr. Neel Shah: A nd as we learned during the Ebola outbreak in Texas people are still
working on hand washing. The hand washing example was a great clue into how to
close the gap although we are still imperfect at hand washing we have improved a lot
and we have improved relatively recently by thinking about the barriers to hand
washing . T he fact that, there is a day actually when I was a medical student where you
walk in and suddenly hand sanitizer became a thing and washing your hand went from
a couple of minute operation to being less than a minute . We have started to institute
360 degree feedbacks and then we have started to flag hospital acquired infections so if
you are the one spreading MRSA from room to room it would get really awkward for you
very quickly . A nd then you know lo and behold hand washing got better and I think with
value there is lot of really similar thing.
It occurred to me when I was a resident, ac a d e mic medical centers are rampantly over
utilizing care , the most expensive places to get care in the country yet the residents are
not really motivated by fee - for - service because they are basically indentured servants .
A nd they are not motivated by medical malpractice because the y are relatively
protected and yet they still over order . And often it has to do with other things that can
similarly be systematically solved for has to do with trying to preempt your future work .
S o if you can order five tests to not think about it again or you can order one test and
then wait three hours and occupy a structure that’s less good . A nd so that suggests a
very different kind of solution.
Mark Masselli: Dr. Shah you have a busy and productive life in addition to your prac tice
and the organization Cost of Care and your book , you are also Associate Professor at
the Ariadne Labs based in Boston , and it's a Harvard based research lab linking
hospitals to best practices that can improve childbirth and maternity experience . C ou ld
you talk about the research you are doing there and what you are learning from this
consortium ?
Dr. Neel Shah: So Ariadne labs is a institute that was founded by Atul Gawande and it
came out of the work that they did with the surgical safety checklist which you know the
same way that a pilot has to run a checklist before hitting with throttle , now surgeons
have to do the same before picking up the scalpel . A nd this interventi on reduces
mortality in half from all surgeries on every content basically. So there is some thinking
about what else and what are the lessons especially around not even creating the
checklist but getting to this implementation problem , we are just talkin g about . H ow you
actually get people to follow it ?
Quality improvement traditionally is very local and there is this sense that quality
improvement projects don’t scale , but the surgical safety checklist sort of proved to that
many other things , medical r econciliation , lot of these things were truly scalable in ways
that made people better . S o this is basically a shop that’s run by a surgeon but it's an
intervention shop where the idea is to do this in a variety of health care domains and as
an obstetrician I am thinking hard about childbirth and the fact that the hospital you go
to is your number one risk factor for having major surgery . A nd so as part of our work
we created a consortium of 50 hospitals across the country to help us think about what
was different from the hospitals that had , you know , they were high performing and low
performing and what are the le s sons that we can extract and scale.
Margaret Flinter: We have been speaking today with Dr. Neel Shah, Founder of Cost of
Care and c o - author of Understanding Value Based Care . You can learn more about his
work by going to costsofcare.org or find them on Twitter @ CostsofCare . Dr. Shah thank
you so much for joining us on Conversations on Health C are today.
Dr. Neel Shah: Thanks so much for having me.
(Music)
Mark Masselli: At Conversations on Health C are we want our audience to be truly in the
know when it comes to the facts about health care reform and policy. Lori Robertson is
an award - winning journalist and Managing Editor of F actCheck.org a nonpartisan,
nonprofit consumer advocate for voters that aim to reduce the level of deception in U . S .
politics. Lori what have you got for us this week?
Lori Robertson: Hillary Clinton said at the democratic presidential debate in November
that literally 3,000 people had been killed by guns including 200 children since the
democrats had last debated about a month before. Comprehensive data on that
specific timeframe isn’t available instead Clinton extrapolated the numbers based on
figures on gun deaths from past years .
In 2013 , there were 33,636 gun deaths according to the Centers for Disease Cont rol
and Prevention that averages to about 2,800 gun deaths or nearly 3,000 as Clinton said
each month of the year. They include suicide which made up 63% of gun deaths that
year, homicides 33% of gun deaths and unintentional discharges , legal intervention s or
war and undetermined causes. As for fire on deaths children the Clinton campaign
relied on figures from 2010 .
The 2013 CDC figures for children 19 and younger back her up those gun deaths
average 205 per month but if we look only at those age 17 an d under the average killed
by month was 105. We won ’ t know the number of gun deaths for 2015 for another year
or so and even then we won’t be able to look at the number for a specific time period as
Clinton cited.
A group called the Gun Violence Archive i t counts 11,633 gun deaths through
November 18 for 2015 but that number doesn’t yet include suicides. The Group’s
Executive Director told us Clinton’s 3,000 figure would likely be right at least based on a
monthly average for the year once suicides are in cluded and that’s my fact check for
this week . I a m Lori Robertson Managing Editor of FactCheck.org.
Margaret Flinter: FactCheck.org is committed to factual accuracy from the country's
major political players and is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the
University of Pennsylvania. If you have a fact, that you would like checked, email u s at
www.chcradio.com . We will have FactCheck.org's Lori Robertson check it out for you
here on Conversations on Health C are.
(Music)
Mark Masselli: Each week Conversations highlights a bright idea about how to ma ke
wellness a part of our communities in everyday lives. Clubfoot is one of the most
common childhood deformities in the world. A condition that in the past was not
correctable without the intervention of expensive and invasive surgeries in low resource
parts of the world access wa s nearly impossible and as a result ---
Chesca Colloredo - Mansfeld : The e ffects on the child are devastating . I t also has an
incredible impact on the mom . T hese kids have to be taken care of because they are
disable d and often the mother is blamed for having a child with any kind of a problem as
well as having a child with a disability.
Mark Masselli: But a breakthrough treatment called the Ponset i m ethod has changed
all of that. Chesca Colloredo - Mansfeld was an emp loyee at the University of Iowa
where this new non - invasive inexpensive intervention was developed which corrected
the problem in a series of months often before a child even begins to walk.
Chesca Colloredo - Mansfeld : The health care provider gently manip ulates the tendons
and ligaments in the foot and move the foot about 10 to 15 degrees and then places the
feet in a long leg plaster of Paris cast , that cast is on for one week and then they repeat
the process and they just gradually move the feet.
Mark Ma sselli: She and her colleagues founded miraclefeet , a non - profit organization
that iden ti fies children throughout the world who can be treated for about $250 per child ,
a tiny fraction of what the surgery would cost and just as effective in treatment of the
condition. Today miraclefeet supports over a hundred clinics through partnerships with
25 different partners in 12 different countries . A lready having given thousands of
children in the developing world the chance to walk, run, play and to grow into
productive adults. m iraclefeet has earned numerous awards for its innovative treatment
design.
Chesca Colloredo - Mansfeld : They have to sleep in a brace at night the one that we
have made, the one that’s winning the awards is made out of plastic . W e came up with
a brace that the shoes clip on and off, it's adjustable, the angles are fixed , so there is no
problem with the medical efficacy of it , and we can produce it for $20. So , we have
essentially come up with a design that enables us to do everything t he U . S . brace does
but for a fraction of the cost.
Mark Masselli: m iraclefeet providing a low cost treatment for children born with clubfoot
around the world giving them a chance to live active and fully productive lives , now
that’s a bright idea.
(Music)
Margaret Flinter: This is Conversations on Health C are, I am Margaret Flinter.
Mark Masselli: And I a m Mark Masselli, peace and health.
Conversations on Health C are, broadcast from the campus of WESU at Wesleyan
University, streaming live at www.wesufm.org and brought to you by the Community
Health Center.